Published On: Sat, Jun 22nd, 2013
The Lead Vaccine Developer Comes Clean So She Can “Sleep At Night”: Gardasil and Cervarix Don’t Work, Are Dangerous, and Weren’t Tested
“I came away from the talk with the
perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than
the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need
the vaccine at all.” – Joan Robinson
Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer
risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are
unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the
United States. In fact, 70% of all H.P.V. infections resolve themselves
without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in
two years. Harper also mentioned the safety angle. All trials of the
vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently
being marketed for 9-year-olds. So far, 15,037 girls have reported
adverse side effects from Gardasil alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event
Reporting System (V.A.E.R.S.), and this number only reflects parents who
underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions. At the
time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these
vaccines. The reported side effects include Guillian Barré Syndrome
(paralysis lasting for years, or permanently — sometimes eventually
causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain
inflammation. Parents are usually not made aware of these risks. Dr.
Harper, the vaccine developer, claimed that she was speaking out, so
that she might finally be able to sleep at night.
“About eight in every ten women who
have been sexually active will have H.P.V. at some stage of their life.
Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears
itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can
lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.” -
Dr. Diane Harper
One must understand how the establishment’s word games are played to
truly understand the meaning of the above quote, and one needs to
understand its unique version of “science”. When they report that
untreated cases “can” lead to something that “may” lead to cervical
cancer, it really means that the relationship is merely a hypothetical
conjecture that is profitable if people actually believe it. In other
words, there is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being
vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but
it is marketed to do that nonetheless. In fact, there is no actual
evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer. From the manufacturers
own admissions, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 for a
specific venereal disease that dies on its own in a relatively short
period, so the chance of it actually helping an individual is about
about the same as the chance of him being struck by a meteorite. Why do
nine-year-old girls need vaccinations for extremely rare and
symptom-less venereal diseases that the immune system usually kills
anyway?